Weekly volume of Atom on osmosis dex
In the right chart, you can see weekly $volume of Atom on osmosis(yellow bars) and weekly price of Atom(blue line).
from Jul.14 when weekly volume of atom on osmosis was 6M$ and atom price was 12$, until the first week of Nov(weekly volume of Atom on osmsis was 153M$ and Atom price was 38$), we can see a great grow in both volume of Atom (on osmosis) and Atom price. When Atom price started to fall from 38$ to 22$(on Dec.13 - 43% decrease), Atom trading volume on Osmosis decreased from 153M$ to 68M$ (45% decrease in dollar amount). Despite the drop in the price of atoms, the volume of traded atom in Osmosis remains constant, which indicates the increase in the acceptance of one of the members of the atom ecosystem (osmosis) among the atom community (which is in favor of the atom).
From Dec.13 when Atom price was 22$ until Jan24 when price was 37$, we see increase of Atom trading volume in osmosis dex. In Nov 2021 when Atom price was 38$, weekly Atom trading volume was 153M$, but on Jan 2022 when atom price was the same as Nov 2022, weekly trading volume was twice (316M$) as Nov 2021 and it recorded ATH in Atom trading volume on Osmosis.
Weekly volume of Atom decreased from 316M$(on Jan 23) to 111M$ (on May 8), But suddenly it increased to 310M$ between May.9 and May.15. The reason was UST collapse on May.9 and i think at those days people started to buy UST/LUNA with Atom or sell UST/LUNA to Atom or they sold Atom for stablecoins. In the right chart you can this event(UST depeg) caused to increase of both weekly count of buys and sells. Weekly count of buys increased from 63K (between Apr.25 and May.3) to 103K (between May.9 and May.15). Alse count of sells increased from 50K (between Apr.25 and May.3) to 114K (between May.9 and May.15). It’s also useful to know that Atom price dropped a lot after UST depeg.
On Jun.6 until Jun.12(above chart) Atom volume decreased to 22M$ which is very low. We see (in the right chart) weekly count of buys decreased from 50K (between May.30 and Jan.6) to 20K (between Jun.6 and Jun.12) and weekly count of sells decreased from 43K (between May.30 and Jan.6) to 17K (between Jun.6 and Jun.12). But why? Really?
On Jun.8, Osmosis team announced a hack in a twitter post . They halted network in block #4713064.
> The exploit was reportedly possible due to a "critical bug" in the protocol's liquidity pools that allowed everyone to increase their position by 50% simply after adding and removing liquidity to any pool. The bug could have potentially drained all liquidity pools.
cryptonews said.
In the right chart, you can see count of buyers, count of sellers and Atom price in Osmosis. It’s clear that over time, the number of atom buyers and sellers in Osmosis has increased, which indicates the increasing in acceptance of Osmosis Dex, which is implemented on the Cosmos network. This means that more users will use Cosmos-based blockchains, which is good for Cosmos.
From Jul 2022 until now, in average atom has 12K buyers and 10K sellers in osmosis on each week.
Weekly total volume and price of Atom
Right chart shows us Atom price and total trading volume of Atom based on coingecko date. As you see :
Trading volume ATH was 19.5B$ (between Sep.20 and Seep.26 of year 2021 - Atom price was 39$).
Between Jan.3 and Jan.9 of year 2022 -when Atom was 39$- trading volume of Atom reached 15B$. After this event, trading volume and price of Atom have been decreasing. Trading volume of Atom decreased from 15B$ to 700M$ and Atom price decreased from 39.5$ to 10$.
You can clearly see the winter in the trading volume of Atom.
Add Text Here
Left chart : Cumulative count of transactions of Cosmos in 2021 and 2022
As you can see, since 2021, Cosmes network has processed 27 million transactions.
The highest increase in transactions was between December 2021 and August 2022.
Cosmos users based on grading ==>
Before we start, you may ask : How did you count addresses as user? What was the grading factor?
grading factor : count of transaction - staked Atom - voting in proposals.
Count of users based on their activity
As you can see…
Bronze users
201K user of cosmos have 1 point.
114K user have 2 point.
86K user have 3 point.
Silver users
85K user have 4 point.
67K user have 5 point.
59K user have 6 point
Gold users
41K user have 7 point.
29K user have 8 point.
17K user have 9 point.
Legend users
13K user have 10 point.
11K user have 11 point.
8k user have 12 point.
based on this grading, Cosmos has 0.731M users
Proposed blocks by each validator
As you can see…
Binance staking validator proposed 5.93% of blocks -476K blocks-.
Coinbase custody validator proposed 5.63% of blocks -453K blocks- .
Stake.fish validator proposed 5.44% of blocks -437K blocks-.
Paradigm validator proposed 4.57% of blocks -367K blocks-.
Kraken validator proposed 4.06% of blocks -326K blocks-.
Point factor
If address did between 5 and 10 tx then 1 point
If address did between 10 and 30 tx then 2 points
If address did between 30 and 100 then 3 points
equal/more than 100 tx 4 points.
If address voted in less than 5 then 1 point
If address voted between 5 and 10 proposals then 2 points
If address voted between 10 and 15 proposals then 3points
If address voted in equal/more than 15 proposals then 4.
If address staked less than 5 Atom then 1 points
If address staked between 5 and 15 Atom then 2 points
If address staked between 15 and 50 Atom then 3 points
If address staked equal/more than 50 Atom then 4 points
Right chart : Total transactions of cosmos blockchain in monthly timeframe and average transaction in every block in monthly
The main growth of the number of transactions of Cosmos network started from December 2021. At the same time, the average number of transactions per block increased. The highest amount of transactions was in August 2022 and the highest average amount of transactions per block was in this month.
Left chart : Unstaked amount of Atom in monthly timeframe
Highest unstaked amount was in May 2021 (23M unstaked atom).
Jan 2022 is in the second place of unstaking amount with 20.7M unstaked Atom.
Oct is in the third place with 17.65M unstaked Atom.
Right chart : staked amount of Atom in monthly timeframe
Highest staked amount was in Apr 2021 (25M unstaked atom).
Mar 2021 is in the second place of unstaking amount with 23M unstaked Atom.
Jan 2022 is in the third place with 20.2M unstaked Atom.
staked amount, unstaked amount and net staked amount of Atom in 2021 and 2022
Users staked 240M Atom in 2021 and 2022, while they unstaked 180M Atom. So in total, 60M Atom has been staked in 2 years (2021 - 2022).
Unstaked amount in daily timeframe
users get their tokens 31 day after they unstaked their tokens.
In the right chart you can see unstaked amount of Atom in daily timeframe. As you can see…
Highest unstaked amount was in May.1 2021 with 11M unstaked Atom.
Jan.7 2022 is in the second place with 9M unstaked Atom.
Nov.17 2022 is in the third place with 6.4M unstaked Atom.
May.14 2022 is in the forth place with 6.32M unstaked Atom.
Staked amount of Atom in daily timeframe
Highest staking amount was 19.25M Atom on Apr.29 2021.
Mar.12 2021 is in the second place with 12.7M staked Atom.
Jan.17 2022 is in the third place with 8.34M Atom.
Aug.4 2022 is in the forth place with 4.77M staked Atom.
Count of unstakers in monthly timeframe
in the right chart you can see count of unstakers in monthly timeframe. As you can see…
Highest count of unstakers was in Mar 2022 with 22K unstakers.
May 2022 is in the second place with 20.7K unstaker.
Jan 2022 is in the third place with 20.3K unstaker.
10.22K unstaker, unstaked 23M Atom in May 2021, which means 2250 unstaked Atom per unstaker.
from first of the 2021 until Mar 2022, we see an increase in count of unstakers and from Mar 2022 until now, count unstakers is dropping.
Count of stakers in monthly timeframe
in the right chart you can see count of stakers in monthly timeframe. As you can see…
Highest count of stakers was in Mar 2022 with 135K stakers.
Apr 2022 is in the second place with 107.7K staker.
May 2022 is in the third place with 107.4K staker.
33.68K staker, staked 24.8M Atom in May 2021, which means 736 staked Atom per staker.
from first of the 2021 until Mar 2022, we see an increase in count of stakers and from Mar 2022 until now, count stakers is dropping.
Proposals, count of voters and votes
Some notes about governance in Cosmos :
> 1 : The voting period is currently a fixed 14-day period.
> 2 : Though a simple majority 'Yes' vote (ie. 50% of participating voting power) is required for a governance proposal vote to pass, a 'NoWithVeto' vote of 33.4% of participating voting power or greater can override this outcome and cause the proposal to fail. This enables a minority group representing greater than 1/3 of participating voting power to fail a proposal that would otherwise pass. > > 3 : A minimum of 40% of the network's total voting power (staked ATOM) is required to participate
In this chart you can see Number of proposals and count of voters to each proposal. For example proposal number 69, in total more than 100k user votes to this proposal. 51.5k of users votes “No”, 20.4K of users votes “Yes”, 30.3K of users votes “No with veto”, and the rest of the users vote ”Abstain”.
So, lets check some of this proposals!
Proposal number 62
> Details : This governance proposal is to request approval from the Cosmos Hub community for the migration of Gravity DEX from Cosmos Hub to a separate Cosmos chain. By voting yes to this proposal, you agree that the Gravity DEX on Cosmos Hub should be migrated to a separate chain. When and if the proposal passes, another governance proposal will be submitted in near future to allow only withdrawal of funds from Gravity DEX. Details of the proposal can be found at IPFS link. https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmecqvwJFPZ4E8jMGvrQweX6jguLkvhWKPBtTPhZJDBMbq
Status : Passed
Votes : 88.98%(56K user - 80.2M Atom) “Yes”
0.37%(1990 user - 336.6K Atom) ”No”
0.03%(222 user - 32K Atom) “No with veto”
10.61%(2380 user - 9.5M Atom) “Abstain”
Proposal number 65
> Details : This on-chain upgrade governance proposal is to adopt gaia v7.0.0 which includes a number of updates and fixes. By voting YES to this proposal, you approve of adding these > > For instructions on performing the upgrade see https://hub.cosmos.network/main/hub-tutorials/upgrade-node.html
Status : Passed
Votes : 99.41%(89.7K user - 100.1M Atom) “Yes”
0.03%(1412 user - 26.6K Atom) ”No”
0.00%(129 user - 3K Atom) “No with veto”
10.56%(1775 user - 566K Atom) “Abstain”
Proposal number 69
> Details : Signaling proposal to include CosmWasm on the Cosmos Hub in v8-Rho upgrade targeting Q2 2022. Further details and discussion at.
Status : Rejected
Votes : 13.77%(20.4K user - 14.6M Atom) “Yes”
63.75%(51.5K user - 67.8M Atom) ”No”
16.37%(30.3K user - 17.4M Atom) “No with veto”
6.11%(3565 user - 6.5M Atom) “Abstain”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96c48/96c48ab206ee8d48b9803f001680ba4fce76a029" alt="db_img"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78bec/78bec8dc2a49dd3fd4f0812018ae537e6a110567" alt="db_img"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5211/e521160182da83c108219b587682df207c6e45e2" alt="db_img"
About Cosmos
There are two expression. First one is Cosmos Hub which refers to Cosmos itself.Like Atom token, governance and all things only on Cosmos blockchain. Second one is Cosmos which refers to Cosmos ecosystem which is a series of lot’s of blockchains that connected to each other, like Thorchains, Cosmos, Osmosis, Juno and etc… .
Lot’s of people know cosmos for heavy Airdrops(like stargaze - Crescent ) that some of them were about thousends of dollars, or Luna-UST which is a blockchain based Cosmos-Hub. Luna had a large market cap in bull market, Luna itself reached approximately 100$ and UST staking was giving users about 18% APY. Luna made Cosmos more famous for users.
Right now, Cosmos ris in the 25th place with 2.8B market cap, 292.5M circulating supply and Atom price is about 9.6$.
In case you can see the photo, it’s a photo of main page of Cosmos website
Conclusion
In the first part, we read more about Atom volume in total(based on coingecko date) and in Osmosis dex. If Osmosis attract more users to trade atom in Osmosis dex, both Osmosis and Cosmos growth.
In the second part, we understood about Users and total transactions of Cosmos in 2021 and 2022. Both are growing and based on my grading, Cosmos has 0.731M user.
In the third part, we saw highest count of unstakers and stakers, highest amount of staking and unstaking, and we understood that in 2021 and 2022, users staked 60M Atom in total.
In the last part, we’ve seen the growth of users who votes to proposals. What we can understand from this part is the growth of cosmos community.
In general, i’m optimism on Cosmos. It’s growing!