==introduction==

What is Cosmos

Cosmos (ATOM) is a cryptocurrency that powers an ecosystem of blockchains designed to scale and interoperate with each other. The team aims to "create an Internet of Blockchains, a network of blockchains able to communicate with each other in a decentralized way." Cosmos is a proof-of-stake chain.

What Is Proposal #82?

We propose a new Cosmos Hub vision document, a counterpart to the 2017 paper which focused primarily on the network of IBC-connected chains. With the creation of the Cosmos Stack (Tendermint, IBC, and SDK) and the development of key technologies for secure economic scaling (Interchain Security and Liquid Staking), the original vision of the Hub has been fulfilled. This document marks the transition to the next phase of the Cosmos Hub as an infrastructure service platform, and a renewed role for ATOM as preferred collateral within the Cosmos Network. It describes two pieces of app-specific functionality, the Interchain Scheduler and Interchain Allocator, which together form a flywheel for accelerating interchain growth. The Interchain Scheduler is a cross-chain block space marketplace, which generates revenues from cross-chain MEV. These revenues are used by the Interchain Allocator to capitalize new Cosmos chains, foster interchain collaboration, and thereby expand the total addressable market of the Scheduler. This paper also describes a new issuance regime optimized for Liquid Staking, where after a 36 month transition period, exponential issuance is reduced to a constant amount of ATOM issued per month. To administer the proposed plan, the paper describes the formation of Cosmos Councils, domain-specialized entities that carry out development and operations. Cosmos Councils together form the Cosmos Assembly, a body that is accountable to ATOM holders, responsible for setting yearly goals, resourcing, and administering work undertaken on behalf of Cosmos Hub.

We have included the paper below in its entirety for the community’s consideration.

Methods

Let's examine the delegation's movement in the cosmos.

In this dashboard you can see that when agents bet from one creditor and move to another, Is there a pattern where they re-bet? Are users more likely to re-delegate after casting their affirmative vote in a way they disagree with? Do they realign their stocks with validations that reflect their value? How do upvotes change during a proposal?

To get the data in the dashboard from the table cosmos.core.fact_msgs WITH FILTER MSG_TYPE IN ('delegate', 'redelegate', 'unbond') From the table osmos.core.fact_msg_attributes with filter attribute_key = 'proposal_id' and attribute_value = '82' Used

Help from jackguy

Cosmos Deligation

Cosmos Redeligation Activity

==Finding==

According to the data, it can be seen that the most performed event is Delegate, and in the continuation of the process, it is clear that at the beginning of 2022, this operation has experienced an increase of almost 4 times, which has reached from 2000 numbers to nearly 8000 numbers. A 4-fold increase in Delegate is a sign of users' interest in the Cosmos network. It can be seen that Delegate has made up 82% of events.

Prop #82 Activity

Conclusion

According to the data, it can be seen that the most performed event is Delegate, and in the continuation of the process, it is clear that at the beginning of 2022, this operation has experienced an increase of almost 4 times, which has reached from 2000 numbers to nearly 8000 numbers. A 4-fold increase in Delegate is a sign of users' interest in the Cosmos network. It can be seen that Delegate has made up 82% of events. What we are witnessing, we can see that the governance activity was the most active in the months of April and March, and it experienced the most activity on October 31, compared to the number of ReDelegate in the months of January to May, there was a significant increase in almost the same months. that the governance activity has increased and these 2 are related to each other. Finally, we experienced 82 thousand ReDelegate in Osmosic, so this close relationship in April and March may have reasons. One is that it indicates a high level of uncertainty or fluctuation in the ecosystem of the universe Another possible explanation is that high levels of governance activity may indicate high levels of user engagement. In this case, increased delegation activity may be a reflection of users actively managing and making strategic decisions about how to allocate their capital in the ecosystem. 88% of voters did not change their vote during Proposition 82. Almost 9% of voters changed their vote only once. I see that More Than 1.6% of users changed their vote twice. 1.38% of Proposition 82 voters changed their vote more than three times.

Most users changed their vote from yes to no with veto. 43 new users, 3.3k regular users, and 14 validators changed their vote from yes to no with veto. This could be because the proposal was not considered a significant enough change to generate a reaction from the community. It is important to note that this proposal was still controversial in the community

==Finding==

88% of voters did not change their vote during Proposition 82. Almost 9% of voters changed their vote only once. I see that 1.6% of users changed their vote twice. More than 1.38% of Proposition 82 voters changed their vote more than three times.

Most users changed their vote from yes to no with veto. 43 new users, 3.3k regular users, and 14 validators changed their vote from yes to no with veto. This could be because the proposal was not considered a significant enough change to generate a reaction from the community. It is important to note that this proposal was still controversial in the community

==Finding==

What we are witnessing, we can see that the governance activity was the most active in the months of April and March, and it experienced the most activity on October 31, compared to the number of ReDelegate in the months of January to May, there was a significant increase in almost the same months. that the governance activity has increased and these 2 are related to each other. Finally, we experienced 82 thousand ReDelegate in Osmosic, so this close relationship in April and March may have reasons. One is that it indicates a high level of uncertainty or fluctuation in the ecosystem of the universe Another possible explanation is that high levels of governance activity may indicate high levels of user engagement. In this case, increased delegation activity may be a reflection of users actively managing and making strategic decisions about how to allocate their capital in the ecosystem.