[ALGO][Q4] Governance Period 1 Breakdown

    - For governance period one, what was the voting breakdown? - How did this change by the size of the algo wallet? - How does this change by number of algos committed?

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...

    Brief On Algorand Governance

    Anyone can participate as a governor by committing algorand to the specified addresses in the form of a Zero Algo( fee only ) payment transaction with a special payload in the tx_message:txn:note field of the transaction.

    Other governance actions are also carried out in a similar manner, be it voting or rewards.

    Some patterns:

    • 'af/gov1:j{"com":' : commitment Tx
    • 'af/gov1:j[3,"a"]': vote A
    • 'af/gov1:j[3,"b"]': vote B
    • 'af/gov1:j{"rewardsPrd":': rewards payment

    However, some rules/conditions need to be maintained otherwise the candidate is no longer an eligible governor nor will the rewards be granted! The rules being:

    • Maintaining a minimum balance throughout the period in the Algo wallet as that which was committed.
    • Participating in the Proposal Rounds by voting.

    In the above visualization, we break the participants into groups based on their committed amounts.

    The break-up is as follows:

    • ALGO COMMITTED < 1000 ---- 'fish'
    • 1000 < ALGO COMMITTED < 10000 ---- 'shark'
    • ALGO COMMITTED >= 10000 ---- 'whale'

    Interesting Observations:

    • It seems the community is split almost equally, with one side just slightly ahead!

    • The size of the wallet/commit doesn't seem to have any distinct impact on the decision-making

    The proposal voted on

    • The proposal presented before the governors was one that would decide if the current governance reward system and the amount of rewards handed out to governors needs a change or not.

    • Dual Choices

      1. Option A: Keeping the Current System as is.
      2. Option B: Higher rewards & slashing
    • Details here