main subjects for this bounty are:

Q1. The Lil Nouns DAO is controlled via onchain voting by token holders. Using the ethereum database, analyze voting activity on Lil Nouns proposals. Since voting is on chain and costs gas, are smaller holders excluded from the voting process? Visualize and analyze this question, along with any other trends you find that are relevant.

so let's find some data about this votes and analyze their behavior in some different methods.

first of all we know that, base on given transaction, contract address for The Lil Nouns DAO is: 0x5d2C31ce16924C2a71D317e5BbFd5ce387854039

and we will find data about this contract in the next parts.

let's see all votes on their proposals per day.

there is no time filter for this chart so first votes were done on May 22th and there is not so much votes for their proposals.

as we see the unique voters count are almost as the same as the voters count. so all voters are unique here.

another point about these votes are that all of the votes had a succeed status.

another good point about these votes are proposal which users had voted most.

there is currently 20 votes on https://lilnouns.wtf/vote that some of them are canceled.

among these 20 proposals, proposal with the Id of 2 has more votes than other proposals.

the above chart shows proposals sorted by vote count.

in the next we will analyze voters balance.

base on this chart, voters with ETH balance between 0 and 1 has voted more than users with higher balances. so smaller holders did not excluded from the voting process.