NEAR Gas Guzzlers

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...

    this dashboard will analyze Near fee used.

    we will find top contracts are users spending the most gas on to use.

    we also show a chart or daily fee and also show some othere data such as total fee spent and also average fee per transaction.

    we will find minimum and maximum fee in a transaction and also divide fees by transactions status.

    Methodology

    since bounty aks for past week and also Past month, in some charts we used both past month, past week and even from Jan 2022.

    in most charts we used near.core.fact_transactions to get to our answers and for fee used by transaction status we have used flipside_prod_db.mdao_near.transactions table.

    also we have used a simple tx on Near and then find fee for this tx from flipside data and find out that real fees for Near are stored as TRANSACTION_FEE/pow(10,24) so we used this fee as real fees.

    above chart shows top 10 contracts that have generated most fee from January 2022.

    since there is no labels on Near then we count TX_SIGNER as contracts on Near.

    so from Jan 2022, relay.aurora is the top 1 contract by generated fee on Near that have used about 197.8K Near as fee.

    relay.aurora has  spent the most gas on to use and in compare to top 2 which has spent about 11K we can say that it is really a lot.

    fees on this chart are base by $Near amount because as said we have converted them to real fees which means fees that users see and acutaully paid it.

    there is no label table to find top 9 contract and also searching it in near explorer came to no name for it. all other contracts have names.

    also we have found top 10 contracts by fee spent for last 30 days ago.

    relay.aurora istop 1 again. from top 1 to top 3 are the same but from top 4 contracts are almost different from top 10 contracts from Jan 2022.

    so we can say that in compare to Jan 2022, some contracts have spent more fees which means they have been active recently.

    we will find top 10 contracts for last week too.

    > Aurora is an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) smart contract platform that creates a bridge between Ethereum and NEAR. An EVM, for those who don’t know, is best thought of as a decentralized computer that allows anyone to create a smart contract on the Ethereum network.

    source

    for the last 7 days ago, again relay.aurora is the top 1 contract that has spent about 5K near which is a lot in compare to top 2and for a week.

    again from top 1 to top 3 are as same as top 3 for last month and even from Jan 2022.

    we see some new contracts in last week that has spent more fees. from top 4 in compare to last month their place has been changed.

    above chart shows Near transaction fee by day for last 30 days ago.

    amounts are by $Near token.

    from Jul 15th there is a increasing fee per day for transactions till Jul 21th.

    since 30 days ago about 15.13K $near are used for transactions fees.

    and as an average for a transaction about 0.001417 $near is spent as fee.

    Near transactions are very cheap in compare to Ethereum network so that’s why average fee for a transaction is very low too.

    since last 30 days ago, about 14K $Near are spent as fee for succeeded transactions and about 1.3K $Near are spent for failed transactions.

    maximum transaction fee was 0.03 $Near and minimum transaction fee spent was about 0.00002 $Near.

    Conclusion:

    relay.aurora is the top contract that has spent more fee than other contracts since last week,last 30 days and even from Jan 2022.

    since last 30 days ago, about 15K $near is spent as fee and as an average each transaction has spent 0.001417 $Near as fee.

    since last 30 days ago, succedded transactions has spent about 14K $near for fee while failed transactions has spent about 1.3K $Near.

    since last 30 days ago, 0.03 $near was maximum fee spent in a transaction and 0.00002 $near was minimum fee spent in a transaction.