Sushi vs Uni on L2

    Compare the market share of Sushiswap and Uniswap on the following L2 chains.

    Introduction


    before start showing data first introduce some of prerequisites

    • L2 what and why : with increase usage of L1 blockchain number of transaction for blockchain increased this increase usually has direct relation with gas because user want to do transaction faster then higher fee and fee goes up more and more. one of ways to reduce gas fee is reduce load on layer 1 blockchain with usage of L2 blockchains. L2 blockchain are blockchains that another base blockchain. their use L1 for their security and use rollup (as of now) to compress and then batch their transaction to L1. Optimism, Arbitrum and Polygon (actually polygon not true l2 and we can say it is a side-chain) are most famous L2 for Ethereum.
    • Dex : decentral exchanges or Dex are Dapps that can exchange one token to another token. actually they are like central exchange but created in blockchain and not controlled by centralized source. uniswap and sushi are two most useful Dex in blockchain world.

    Data Collection


    all data that i want to show came from flipsidecrypto data.i want to show swap and swapper info from 2 Dapp in 3 blockchain. but they way i collected data can be seprate in two part :

    1. Sushi Data : with help of Flipside. sushi has own table for all of this blockchain and  .sushi.ea_swaps table used for getting data.
    2. Uni Data : the uni data is a bit harder and don’t have seprate table sushi Sushi. to get Uni data first go to uni document and get uni Router address but then i understand there is another address that label Uni Router and used as of know. so i forced to use .core.fact_transactions table for getting data and (TO_ADDRESS = lower('0xE592427A0AEce92De3Edee1F18E0157C05861564') or TO_ADDRESS = lower('0x68b3465833fb72a70ecdf485e0e4c7bd8665fc45')) to filter swap transactions.

    data that came from blockchain don’t have same time and some blockchain has older data than other also these Dapps not deployed same time and they have diffrent deploy time. to reduce this effect and know we have equal condition for all blockchains and Dapp all of data are after 2022/05/01

    Total Info Metrics


    for first part i want to some metrics for Uni and Sushi in diffrent blockchain and see how is state of thse

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...

    Conclusion


    1. as data shows number of swap in L2 increase as time goes while market condition get worse and worse
    2. while in Arbitrum and Polygon, Sushi and Uni has close competition. in Optimism uni take over Sushi.as this dashboard we see Velodrome take sushi place in Optimism.
    3. UniSwap user use uni more than one blockchain or Uni Swap user more use multiple L2 that Sushi.
    4. seems after Ethreum merge real L2 (Optimism and Arbitrum) take over side-chain (Polygon)
    5. as Cumulative chart show both Sushi and Uni in growth and seem with help of Optimims the amount of growth is more in Uniswap TXs
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    db_img

    Uni image came from uniswap assets and sushi illustrator came from sushi Press kit . all of them are free to access

    data shows intersting results. in total all of L2 Uni about 2x more swap than Sushi. but in individual blockchain we see in Arbitrum we see close competition but in Polygon this gap increased and in Optimism this gap get worse. in second part that show number of addresses that use uni or sushi in just one blockchain we clearly see in Polygon and Arbitrum more unique user use sushi while in Optimism this is diffrent. another intersting this of this data came from compare of Unique swap each blockcahin for each Dapp with Total Unique Swaps. while in two of three sushi has more but in total Uni has more unique user. from this data we can result UniSwap user use uni more than one blockchain or Uni Swap user more use multiple L2 that Sushi.

    Daily Information


    after see swap data in whole picture this is time to see Swap info in detail and see who it is going on in each day.

    daily percentage usage shows most of Sushi’s Swap created in Arbitrum and as time goes this usage increase more and more of couse we clearly see Arbitrum has more swap and tx from Sep and both Uni and Sushi chart shows this. performance of Sushi in Optimism is so bad and show just a limited of user just use Sushi in Optimism.