In this dashboard, we will look at eclipse score. This has been calculated using:

1. Number of active proposals voted on (By active it is implied that the participation as been within the last 90 days)

2. The number of proposals where retailers and validators have voted differently are penalised by twice that of the proposals they've voted

3. The more the voting power, the more centralised the validator is, hence this is also penalised heavily.

So, based on the above 3 metrics, the validator score came out to be:

Let's view this as a distribution:

The best ones are- Angel and Talis Protocol since they are active participants, have lower voting power and vote as per the requirements of the retailers. The worst ones include- ALLnodes, larry's stakehouse and Chorus.One. The top 10 validators by this score can be seen below:

Notably, all among the top 10 have an almost equivalent score with some getting a slight edge over the others. Next, let's view the bottom 10:

Conclusions:

1. Angel and Talis are the best when it comes to governance based distribution. They are active voters, vote as per the retail's decision and are having a lower voting power implying more decentralisation

2. Allnodes and larry's stakinghouse are the worst since they do not actively take part in governance and vote against the retail's decision