Algo dex transaction dominance

    we examine transaction counts of Algorand's main Dexes compared to other applications

    Loading...
    Loading...

    The Bounty Challenge Has Been Laid Upon Us !!!

    > Q115. Using the following App ID lists from Folks Finance, AlgoFi, Tinyman, and AlgoDex, lets look at what percent of transactions their app calls and associated transactions(transactions in the same tx_group_id) make up on the Algorand blockchain. 

    Behold the inedible donuts below. Therein we discover DD or Dex Dominance if you prefer. We see that when we look at group transactions that algofi accounts for a glutonous 60% of the total! Tinyman also comprises a major percentage of Algorand group tranactions. Folks Finance, in spite of the frighteningly large list of application IDs barely make a dent in the totals. Algodex also is ineffectual.

    For the little guys, Algodex and Folks,

    Algofi is not quite as greedy when looking at total transactions, but they still account for about half. Note that I used just one day’s count, because there are tens of thousands of transactions and I thought we would get a pretty good feel of the current situation.

    Bounty Challenge Phase II

    > How have the number of transactions changed over time for each Protocol?

    Behold the stacked bar chart! It tells a threefold story.

    1. Algofi turns the tables on Tinyman, which dominated transaction share, early in the year. Now it has the same dominance over Tinyman. They are finally living up to their name!
    2. The other applications have not just declined; they also make up a smaller percentage of the total transactions.
    3. The third story is hidden unless you uncheck the Algofi, Tinyman and other boxes. Here, I will do it for you. Right below here, you see a tale of two dexes, with Algodex accounting for a small fraction of what they were doing early in the year
    Loading...
    Loading...

    Bounty Challenge Phase III

    > Also how much in fees have been spent on transactions relating to each protocol?

    Are you kidding?

    • This is Algorand. The fees are negligible
    • Fees are by transaction. Therefore the existing charts tell that story.
    • For a detailed examination of the wonderfully small transaction fees on Algorand, check out my previous bounty submission

    Regretably we have run out of time. Therefore we leave the challenge of the impact of price on transactions and the different types of transactions, to the eager, grand-prize seeking analyst.

    Finally, I’d just like to say ‘Thanks’ on behalf of myself and the whole group and I hope we pass the audition.