Pool of the Week
This dashboard gives an info on the four mentioned pool in the Osmosis network in particular Pool 833 -stOSMO / OSMO Pool 837 - IST / OSMO Pool 840 - BNB / OSMO Pool 634 - wETH.grv / OSMO Let us check all these pools and see how the Users and the Liquidity changed over time.
INTRODUCTION
Osmosis is an entirely customizable AMM that enables developers to build unique liquidity pools and design and deploy one-of-a-kind custom AMMs that can respond quickly to changing market conditions.
The Osmosis automated market maker (AMM) allows users to create new, unique liquidity pools controlled and maintained by other players. The Osmosis token (OSMO), used in all of its pools, is used for voting, staking, and liquidity. For Liquidity Bootstrapping Pools (LBPs), a unique kind of AMM made for token sales, Osmosis provides a practical design. A collection of digital assets amassed for the purpose of enabling trade on a decentralized exchange is known as a liquidity pool (DEX). A DEX is an exchange that manages user money internally rather than via a third party. DEX users deal directly with one another instead.
Voting, staking, and liquidity are all done with the Osmosis token (OSMO), which is utilized across all of its pools. Users may stake assets to safeguard the network while also contributing assets to a liquidity pool thanks to superfluid staking, a revolutionary Osmosis protocol process. The Osmosis protocol is primarily motivated by the ideas of heterogeneity and sovereignty. Osmosis uses self-governing liquidity pools to do this. Users may utilize the native Osmosis token (OSMO) to vote on pool specifications and protocols, offer liquidity, and stake in these Osmosis liquidity pools since they are not hard-coded. In essence, it gives token owners the ability to choose the composition of certain liquidity pools in addition to playing a crucial part in the overall governance of the Osmosis protocol.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/359d3/359d357d3dc32528266fb8149f13b75fbced56c2" alt="db_img"
METHODOLOGY
The tables which provided enough data are
-
osmosis.core.fact_locked_liquidity_actions
-
osmosis.core.dim_labels
-
osmosis.core.dim_prices
Initially, the stOSMO/OSMO pool is analyzed with the average transactions, users, as well as the average volume of the liquidity, which is also charted with two-time frames such as before choosing and after choosing the pool of the week and also as joined and exited depending on the time mentioned in the bounty. Similarly, the analysis with the time is also charted to see how it evolved over time in the month of November. The same is also done for all four pools. Now with the time frame, an overall comparison of all four Liquidity pools is also done. Finally, it is concluded by the set of trend analysis with all four pools and from this, a better perception of the pool of the week could be estimated.
The chart here shows the stOSMO/OSMO pool actions with different parameters such as the transactions, liquidity providers as well as the average volume of the transactions with the time period as pool exited and pool joined which is the time based on the bounty. an it is seen that average of all the values are way higher in the scales of magnitudes after the pool joined than the pool exited.
The chart ion the stOSMO/OSMO pool shows a similar trend on the functions but the difference is that here the time period is the date when the pool is chosen as the pool of the week and it is seen that the values are higher before it is considered as the pool of the week.
The chart here shows the wETH.grv/OSMO pool actions with different parameters such as the transactions, and liquidity providers as well as the average volume of the transactions with the time period as the pool exited and pool joined which is the time based on the bounty. it is seen that the average of all the values is way higher in the scales of magnitudes after the pool joined than the pool exited except for the average volume which is a bit higher during the pool exited.
The chart ion the wETH.grv/OSMO pool shows a similar trend on the functions but the difference is that here the time period is the date when the pool is chosen as the pool of the week and it is seen that the average volume is higher before being chosen as the pool of the week and similar the case of other params.
The chart here shows the IST/OSMO pool actions with different parameters such as the transactions, and liquidity providers as well as the average volume of the transactions with the time period as the pool exited and pool joined which is the time based on the bounty. it is seen that the average of all the values is way higher in the scales of magnitudes after the pool joined than the pool exited except for the average New liquidity providers which are a bit higher during the pool exited. This shows that the New LPers were more while the pool exited.
The chart ion the IST/OSMO pool shows a similar trend on the functions but the difference is that here the time period is the date when the pool is chosen as the pool of the week and it is seen that the values are higher after it is considered as the pool of the week But that the average active liquidity providers and the Average transactions of the Liquidity were higher when the pool is chosen as the pool of the week while the average volume is higher before when the pool is chosen as the pool of the week.
The chart here shows the BNB/OSMO pool actions with different parameters such as the transactions, and liquidity providers as well as the average volume of the transactions with the time period as the pool exited and pool joined which is the time based on the bounty. it is seen that the average of all the values is way higher in the scales of magnitudes after the pool joined than the pool exited.
The chart ion the BNB/OSMO pool shows a similar trend on the functions but the difference is that here the time period is the date when the pool is chosen as the pool of the week and it is seen that the values are higher after it is considered as the pool of the week But that the average active liquidity providers and the Average transactions of the Liquidity were higher when the pool is chosen as the pool of the week while the average volume is higher before when the pool is chosen as the pool of the week.
The chart to the top is a timely analysis of the different actions over time in the pool and it is seen from the chart to the right that the volume of the Liquidity removed is way higher after the pool is chosen as the pool of the week than before.
This is a sample chart hence similar charts can be produced for other pools too.
Both the New Liquidity providers and the liquidity provided volume is charted with time so as to see how much each pool hold and it is seen that in the liquidity volume, BNB/OSMO pool holds more than half while stOSMO/OSMO holds the second place.
On looking into the Average New Liquidity providers, stOSMO/OSMO holds the highest and BNB/OSMO is the second place holder.
The average Liquidity provider is considered here and the above one mentions the New Liquidity providers. here it is also seen as a similar trend as new LPers and the same is also followed by the average transactions count. hence in comparing all the four, only the volume parameter is dominated by the BNB/OSMO pool
The overall chart on the average volume with the two timespans is charted here with all the pools and it is also clear that the pools hold most of their volume before being chosen as the pool of the week.
The overall chart on the average New Liquidity providers with the two timespans is charted here with all the pools and it is also clear that the new Liquidity providers join before being chosen as the pool of the week.
The overall chart on the average Active Liquidity providers with the two timespans is charted here with all the pools and it is also clear that the active Liquidity providers were higher before being chosen as the pool of the week.
The overall chart on the average Active Liquidity providers with the two timespans is charted here with all the pools and it is also clear that the average transaction count for the liquidity were higher before being chosen as the pool of the week.
INFERENCE
The Osmosis Support Labs team made the announcement of the pool in the first week, and based on the number of transactions and users, this plan was well received. However, as the weeks went on, the plan got less popular, especially in the last week of November. This is because, primarily on Tuesdays after the first day of the week, we can see growth in terms of TXs and Providers, but in the last week, not only is there no growth, but also on the last day of the week. We can see that all of the pools have a downward slope in these two charts comparing TXs and providers in November. Even on the dates mentioned in the question, we don't have sharp movement, maybe just in pool 833 on November 1. In the next chart, ranking pools, pool 833 is ranked eighth. Also, it is seen that pool id #833 stOSMO / OSMO is the largest.
Additionally, there are a number of providers that top the list in terms of transactions, volume, and USD volume. What's more, for this program, we see these numbers in these terms are not excessive, And obviously, clients stand out to this program and it has not drawn in them.