Comparing NEAR, Solana, and Ronin: The Role of Gaming in Their Ecosystems

    In my research on Web3 gaming's contribution to the Solana ecosystem, I developed a set of metrics to gauge the impact of gamers on the broader ecosystem, resulting in a set of standardized facts. This dashboard aims to extend that analysis to the NEAR ecosystem. The insights gained from studying Solana's ecosystem provide valuable lessons that can be applied to other blockchain networks. This dashboard begins with a focused approach, concentrating on the first principle of how Web3 gaming can support an ecosystem: through fees and staking, which I refer to as infrastructure support.

    Stylized Facts:

    • Web3 games generate more transactions per user, primarily influenced by the extent to which transactions occur on-chain.
    • Consequently, they also generate higher transaction fees per wallet.

    There are three main ways games contribute to the ecosystem:

    1. Direct Support to the Infrastructure: Games financially support the network through fees collected and blockchain tokens delegated, thereby enhancing network value.
    2. Usage of DApps and DeFi Programs: Gameplay drives engagement with DeFi platforms, as players earn token rewards, which in turn generates fees. Players also contribute by purchasing NFTs and participating in a variety of DApps.
    3. Financial Influence: Games contribute significantly by purchasing MINTs and participating in pre-sales, essentially funding the growth of new projects within the ecosystem.

    Each of these aspects can be studied and quantified more thoroughly.

    Three key factors determine a game's overall contribution to the blockchain:

    1. The level of blockchain integration: This integration can be measured on a scale.

    A. Web3-Tangential: The most common type involves transactions related to depositing/withdrawing USDC and in-game rewards/assets. Some DApps may be featured, such as staking protocols and marketplaces, but on-chain integration is minimal.

    B. Governance Systems and Dual Token Systems: The introduction of a governance token, often facilitated by DAOs, increases on-chain interactions. A notable example is the swap between in-game tokens and the DAO governance token, adding extra transactions.

    C. On-Chain Crafting Features: Games with on-chain crafting features show a higher level of integration, significantly increasing the number of on-chain transactions.

    D. Fully Integrated Games: These games record every transaction on the blockchain, encompassing all elements from A-C, plus additional in-game transactions.

    2. The size and wealth of the community surrounding the game: A larger and wealthier player base inherently leads to more transactions, regardless of the level of blockchain integration.

    3. The use of NFT assets within the game: Especially the presence of bots, which can significantly increase the number of transactions per player due to their continuous activity.

    Each institutional feature exhibits a unique level of engagement. Understanding this relationship is crucial for our research.

    For instance, the likelihood of someone selling or buying an NFT, locking a token, swapping a token for USDC, or staking/unstaking an NFT can be understood as static probabilities. However, these activities are time-varying and influenced by the game's business cycle. Given that blockchain gaming is inherently financial, financial incentives often drive the intensity of player interactions with the core institutions of a Web3 ecosystem.

    The purpose of the dashboard is to provide examples of how to evaluate the importance of certain programs and protocals to any blockchain. Here we focus on gaming.

    db_img
    db_img

    What is blockchain monitoring? What is the way in which we should evaluate rapid movements on chain and the impact of financial conditions? This Dashboard begins by identiying and reporting on how to evaluate any blockchain using a factor based approach. First, we must know our communities. We must know their investments and vulnerabilities. We must know their contributions to the over-all health of the blockchain. Here we focus on gaming.